Sunday, September 30, 2012

Let's Talk About Coffee, Sex, and Politics

You know, when I started this post, it was going to be a pretty bland one.  I was going to start off talking about how, after a bit of soul searching, I decided to join my co-worker's coffee mess at the Crackerjack factory (basically the choice was pay $6.00 and drink crappy coffee till Christmastime or keep up my $8.00 a week Starbucks VIA habit).  Somehow I was going to segue that into politics to set the stage for the upcoming debate this Wednesday, which I will be blogging through like I did the convention speeches.  The plan was just to let everyone know where I was at, which candidate I was leaning towards, and why.

Normally the title is the last thing I write, but today for some reason it was the first and I felt that the planned post just wasn't equal to it. That may be because when I was thinking about this post today talking about sex wasn't part of the plan, but it also may be because the title seems to hint that I have some sort of grand unifying statement to make about these three seemingly disparate elements.

And indeed they are disparate.  A connection between politics and sex is clear enough; I don't know if being in power gives politicians (historically mostly men) a feeling of entitlement or if the strain of politicking lends one to bend the moral principles so many of the political class say they have written on their hearts, but from Alexander Hamilton's affair with Maria Reynolds to Grover Cleveland's bastard child to the social media savvy Anthony Weiner, US political life increasingly marches to a rather booty shaking drumbeat of sexual scandaliciousness.

The connection between coffee and politics is also clear.  European coffee houses were places were people of all classes and outlooks could discuss the matters of the day, and became associated with republicanism and equality.  Some authors suggest that it is not coincidental that coffee houses were established in Europe just before the Enlightenment began, suggesting a cause an effect relationship as coffee allowed European thinkers to liberate their minds from a perpetual haze of alcohol.  Closer to home, coffee replaced tea in the colonies as our forefathers and mothers tried to distance themselves as much as possible from all things British after Parliament placed taxes on tea and gave the British East India Company exclusive access to the colonial tea market.

Today there are coffeehouses that seem diametrically opposed when it comes to politics (if we think of politics as an extension of our beliefs and cultural makeup).  On the one hand you have the locally owned Bollos Bakeries of the world, where crunchy anti-establishment types meet up to do their crunchy anti-establishment things.  On the other hand you have your five friendly local outposts of the global coffee capitalist Empire, where the establishment goes to get their pumpkin mocha latte fix because Starbucks has drive through, Bollos does not, and the establishment has shit to do.  We don't have time to sit around all day scrawling poetry in moleskine journals and contemplate the holes in our sweaters.  Here is your $5.95.  Give me my damn coffee and let me get on my way.  Oh, is that a new Bruce Springsteen Album?  Don't mind if I do.

But sex and coffee?  That is a tough one.  Coffee is not, in my experience, and aphrodisiac, and it doesn't lower the inhibitions.  In fact, as it sharpens the mind, it makes it less likely that you are going to go home with that librarian sitting in the corner eyeing you up over the top of her Kindle.

Before I go on, just let me say that the Kindle and other e-readers seriously fucked up my game.  In the old days, if a woman was reading a book and you were interested in having sexual intercourse with her as soon as humanly possible, a safe opening move was to go over and say "Hey, is that the autobiography of Benvenuto Cellini, Italian sculptor and general renaissance man?  What do you think of it?  Do you like it?"  6 months to 10 years later, after a long, careful campaign with many highs and lows, you're checking the expiration date on that old dusty box of condoms and rummaging around for your Best of James Brown CD (don't you have an Ipod yet?) because you, Sir, are a sex machine and it's about to be too hot in the hot tub.

But now?  You just don't know.  Is she reading 50 Shades of Gray and imaging all the things she could do to you?  Or is she reading Jane Goodall's 1986 classic The Chimpanzees of Gombe:  Patterns of Behavior and comparing you to the protagonists?  You just don't know.

Returning to the matter at hand: we still seek a link between sex and coffee.  As I said previously, coffee makes it less likely that you are going to hook up with that librarian because you will start analyzing the consequences of your actions and decide that its not really worth it.  You got an exam in a couple weeks, after all, that you have to study for, and in the morning you really got to get the cat to the therapist because she finally steeled herself up for the much anticipated confrontation with the Roomba and she lost in a split decision.  It's really effected her self-esteem, and she just hasn't been the same since.  She may need some kitty Zoloft or something.  If you are up all night banging the bejeezus out of some librarian you met at Starbucks, well, you won't have time to do all that really important stuff.  So you pass it up, order your latte, and be on your busy way.

Alcohol is way better for all this.  I mean, if you go to the club and some girl has her bootie poppin in front of you and you got some Jose Cuervo in you there is only one thought on your alcohol addled mind, and it isn't how things might have turned out different for Sweden during the Great Northern War if Charles XII hadn't been killed during the siege of Fredriksten in 1718.  You are more likely to risk a proposition, she is probably more likely to accept, and in the morning you'll be making pancakes.  I hope you save some of that syrup.

Coffee shops may also have cute baristas, but if a cute coffee barista asks me if I want another coffee I am going to say no, because too much coffee gives me the jitters.  But if a well endowed bartender asks me if I want another beer, I am certain to say yes; beer and boobs in any combination are my kryptonite. I shudder, dear friends, to think of the amount of money I have parted with simply because of a strategically unbuttoned button or a well practiced lean across the bar and a nice smile.  Probably enough money to buy a good friend who is moving to Indiana a snowblower or two.

Coffee has one good thing for it though, when it comes to sex.  If you are married, and if you are subject to the perpetual exhaustion of children, drinking coffee at night increases the chances that you are actually going to be awake enough at night to have sex with your spouse, provided of course that you are willing to stop checking  on the status of your fantasy football team and she is willing to stop taking over the world.

Well, I think that is about it.  It's been a long slog, I have failed to link it all together (though I might take a shot at it mathematically), and I am going to bed....to sleep.  Because tonight I have not had my coffee but rather been sipping on a jigger of excellent rum, and I find that the combination of alcohol and perpetual exhaustion have made sleep seem preferable to all other activities that one could engage in at 11:41 PM on a Sunday night, except maybe getting together with some buds and singing a jaunty tune, such as this:

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Godiva was a lady who through Coventry did ride.
To show all of the villagers her lovely white hide.
The most observant villager, an Engineer of course,
Was the only one that noticed that Godiva road a horse.





 

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Books You May Not Like: The Aubrey Maturin Series

So the other day I finally finished reading the Aubrey Maturin series -- which I sometimes refer to the Master and Commander series, because the excellent movie of the same name is cobbled together from a number of the books in the series.

It's been quite an undertaking.  The series spans 20 books (plus one very unfinished book which I have not read but probably will at some point just for kicks) and its taken me about six and half years of intermittent reading to get through them all.

For those of you not in the know, the series follows the naval careers of Captain Jack Aubrey and surgeon Stephen Maturin as they fight with the Royal Navy during the Napoleonic Wars.  These two main characters are very rich and multi-faceted, and their friendship is as much the subject of the books than the trials of being at war upon the raging sea in the age of sail.

On the one hand you have Jack Aubrey, sometimes known as lucky Jack, reknown for his fighting abilities and his...well, luck.  A capital seaman, a believer in brisk gunnery, a captain who will push his men to their limits to achieve his mission -- or better yet, to take a prize.  But he cares for his men, uses the lash sparingly, and his highest concern (aside from his duty) is to keep a happy ship.

On the other hand you have the surgeon, Stephen Maturin.  He is a man of the enlightenment:  a scientifically minded surgeon, a physician, who can have your leg off faster than you can say "Excuse me, I think I need more rum for...oh, my leg is gone.  Thanks".  He has a keen interest in nature (he is called a naturalist but I suppose today he would be considered a biologist) and is forever studying the wildlife in all of the locations that the service takes him.  Oh, and another little thing:  Stephen Maturin is a British spy.  As the novels reach into the teens it is his missions that tend to drive the plot -- Jack Aubrey and his various ships provide the transportation and sometimes the firepower necessary to achieve his covert goals.

They go through a lot together.  Even though Lucky Jack enjoys lots of victories, the pair of characters have a few ships sunk out from under them, get shipwrecked a couple times, and I can think of three occasions where they are made prisoners of war.  Fortunes are won, lost, won again. At one point Jack is actually drummed out of the service after being unjustly framed in a financial scandal.

The men have deep faults.  For all his good fortune at sea lucky Jack has very little on land.  On at least one occasion Jack boards his ship to escape from the debtors prison, and when he is in a far away land he is on one or two occasions unfaithful to his wife (who, it must be said, is much beloved).  For his part, Stephen struggles with addiction to opiates and cocoa leaves.

Both men love music dearly - indeed, it is at a concert when they first meet, though they nearly fight a duel because Stephen will not stop beating time to the music - and that is one of the things that cements their friendship as they play violin and cello in the master's cabin, late into the night.

Now, lately I have across people who have tried to read some of the books and found them dull.  Patrick O'Brian's writing style is not a modern one; I would compare him to a modern day composer writing music in the style of Mozart or Clementi.  O'Brian also plies on countless nautical jargon, terms, and idioms; and if modern naval jargon is difficult enough to follow, 19th century naval jargon is especially daunting.

But O'Brian achieves an immersion effect.  The words just kind of wash over you and you can still get a picture of at least something happening in your mind.  That may not really recommend the series, but what it does do is give the books an authenticity with regards to what life was really like in a well handled ship of war.

The books do have some flaws, of course.  The overall story advances into the year 1812 relatively quickly, and as O'Brian decides to write more books he has to sort of suspend the year 1812 from something like books 6 - 18;  he is at least good enough to inform readers in one of the introductions that he is going to start doing this.  And some of the books are just better than others.  It is with a great bit of irony that "The Far Side of the World", which was a great movie, is probably my least favorite of the books.

But to say this series of flaws is much the same as saying that Beethoven's 9th has flaws:  It may drag here or there, but overall I think this is a masterwork of a particular kind.

And what am I going to do now that I have finished the series?

Start it over again, of course.


The Hokies Invade the North - and Lose. Again.

Okay Hokie fans.  Light up a cigarette with shaky hands to steady the old nerves; it's time for another wassoblog sports update.

It's been a ....a mixed week for sports this week.  Let's run through the news.

Football:   The Steelers lost to Denver last week, but I wasn't surprised -- as a matter of fact, I was actually rather pleased with myself because I picked them to lose that game.  I find that in that situation the pride I gain by actually predicting the outcome of the game swallows up any bad feelings I might have about the Steelers losing.  Clearly, I have much yet to learn about being a true NFL fan.  

Good news is this week the Steelers are hosting the Jets, and I have gotten behind my team and picked them to win.  So I will be able to root 100% for the team.  Come on Steelers!

Football:  The Marickovich Zips, the premier fantasy team in NNS E42 league B, picked up their first ever win this week!  Go Zips!

Football:   Chelsea are top of the table, the only team in the premier league to get three wins out of their first three games.  As of press time they have already played against QPR but I am currently watching it on DVR.  The game is at QPR and Chelsea are having a tough time breaking them...but as we approach half time its still 0-0 and the intensity of the match has lessened.  

It's a game with a lot of bite to it - last year Chelsea defender John Terry was accused of using a racial slur against one of the QPR players.  He was actually charged with a crime somehow in relation to that (amazing that, yeah?  But that's English law for you) but was acquitted.  So the two teams have a history. 

Incidentally, I will often pick Chelsea to lose a match if I really think they are going to be defeated - I am a realist after all, often to a fault.  But if Chelsea loses I derive little joy out of picking the outcome correctly.  Just shows you where my true colors lie.

And finally:

Sigh...Football:  Frank Beamer could only watch in dismay behind a pair of old man sunglasses (really, I think my grandmother has the same pair) as The Hokies were defeated by Pitt yesterday, 35-17.  I talked to my cousin John Marinkovic, who traveled with the team, about the game.  

Me:  Hey John.  

John:  Hey.  

Me:  I know you were traveling with the team this weekend.  Do you think you could answer a couple questions about the game?

John:  I'd be delighted.  

Me:  Great.  So why were you traveling with the team?

John:  I guess they thought since our ancestors came over from Serb-

Me (interjecting): Croatia

John:  from SERBIA to western PA to work in the mills, I guess they thought I could help them navigate the culture.  

Me:  But you and I have never lived in western PA. 

John:  I know that.  But Jim Weaver, Grand Poo-bah of athletic strategery, was insistent.  Really thought it would help the team win.

Me:  Well, you did a lousy job.  

John:  It's not my fault.  

Me:  So why do you think the Hokies lost?

John:  Well, I think the area just got to the Hokies.  It's almost as if Pitt retreated from Cincinnati last week and gutted the country side around Pittsburgh.  I mean, the mills are shut down, the town centers are empty, the bakeries are all shuttered.  

Me:  Does the Tarquinio bakery, maker of bread that is lighter than air (because, for the most part, it is air), still stand?

John:  No.  And that's part of the thing.  I mean, it was a miserable trip.  As we drove up I-79 the sun disappeared behind the clouds.  Everything just got grey.  There was snow still in places betwixt

Me (interjecting again):  Betwixt?  Are you fucking kidding me?

John: BETWIXT the leafless trees.  Wolves prowling the empty, derelict streets, looking for lost gypsy children.  

Me:  Oh come on.  I thought Pittsburgh was being revitalized by reinvestment in the IT industry.

John:  Were you there?

Me:  No.

John:  Well I was, so shut up.  The city proper is one thing, but that "revitalization" has yet to really reach the outlying areas.  Look, most of the guys on the Hokies team are Virginia boys, used to the sunny countryside, the rolling hills, the rustling of taffetta gowns through spacious colonial homes.  It was a real culture shock.  One of the players came up to me on the bus and said "Dude, where the hell are we?  This place looks like it's right out of that fucking Deerhunter movie".  

Me:  An astute observation.  But wasn't that filmed in Cleveland?

John:  Would you want to travel to Cleveland to play football?

Me:  Well, if that means you are going to be playing the Cleveland Browns, then maybe, because you are likely to win.  But no, I see what you mean.  That would be extremely unnerving if you weren't used to it.

John.  Yeah.  And you know, when we got there, the only restaurant still open was Permanti Brothers.  While the boys from Pitt have been raised on that kind of stuff, the kids from Va Tech are just not used to all that grease, eggs, cheese, the meats....I think the fact that they were forced to eat there because there was no other option may explain the Hokies sluggish start.

Me:  And you think if the Hokies had been in a better frame of mind, if they had been not so depressed from their journey into the north, you think maybe they would have found a way to overcome that sluggish start?

John:  Absolutely.  

Me:  Great work!  Thanks John.  Doviđenja!

John: You mean довиђења, don't you?

Me:  Fuck you.

John:  Right back at you. 

So there you have it.  Expert sports analysis from the Marickovich/Marinkovich clan.  Stay tuned.




          


Thursday, September 6, 2012

Thoughts on President Obama's Acceptance Speech - Liveish

Well, no one was asking for it, but I guess since I blogged during Romney's acceptance speech I reckon I am going to blog during Obama's as well.

This could be a little more interesting though, becuase

1.  I am really very tired.  It's been a long week.

2.  I am currently drinking a Daily's Ready To Drink Strawberry Daiquiri, which is a ready made strawberry daiquiri in a Capri Sun like pouch that you stick in your freezer for a bit until it is all frozen and delicious.


Alcohol is in it, indeed.

For now, the channel is on CNN and Joe Biden is speaking.  I think he really is a poor public speaker.  I've actually spent most of his speech working on my Fantasy Football team, "The Marickovich Zips", whose motto is "U zanemarivanja pobjede", which is Croatian for "In Neglect, Victory".  I actually made some moves tonight (brought in Ryan Fitzpatrick as my back-up QB, dropped my second string kicker for a different defense so I can cover my bye week).  The draft was an auto draft, and I am pretty pleased.  I have Matt Ryan as my starter QB (yes Hokie fans, that guy), Calvin Johnson at WR and the great Rob Gronkowski as my TE.  Its my first season in fantasy football.

Earlier I did notice the Foo Fighters were on.  What a career Dave Grohl has had, yeah?  I mean, twenty years ago he was playing with Nirvana, playing having thousands of disaffected youth singing along "Lithium", and now he is playing for "the man".  Not to say he sold out or anything like that.  Not at all.  Its just an amazing journey.

Oh shit, CNN has James Carville on the panel tonight.  He is to political commentary what Dick Vitalle is to basketball commentary (i.e. annoying).  I'm changing to NBC.

Tom Brokaw is in the booth?  Wasn't he in the hospital last night?  Ah.  Mistakingly took an Ambien.  Hate it when that happens.

Okay, Biden's done.  There is going to be a movie!  I can't wait!  Shut your pie hole, Dick!  Start the movie!

Oh boy.  Don't compare Obama to Abraham Lincoln, senator Durbin.  That is just asking for trouble.  Lincoln was an incredible leader - Obama less so.

Okay.  1016.  Movie starts.  Piano music.  George Clooney.  Appeals to Americas history.  Bill Clinton (heck of a speech yesturday, by the by.  I wonder if Obama can actually top him).  Michelle Obama.  Young Obama.  Joe Biden.

1019 Obama may go to bed at 1 AM.  The question is, what time does he get up?  8?  9?  Does he roll out of bed in his PJs at 1100 and rush to his morning briefing with a pop tart in hand?

1022  So Obama saved the auto industry and killed Osama bin Laden.  George Clooney's back.  The film is almost over and this thing is about to kick off.  Quirky sound track building to the climax....

1023  And....Oh, its only Michelle Obama.  Its nice that she gets to introduce the president.  Nice touch.

1023  No stairs for Obama.  Can't risk a stumble.  Maybe it shows that Romney does indeed have more guts.  Remember, he elected to walk up stairs to the podium.  Point:  Romney.

1025:  And he's wearing a blue tie!  I had a hunch that he would.

1025:  I also note that Obama's earlobes are NOT connected to his face.  Don't know that if bodes well for the man, but that is definetly something that sets the two candidates apart.

1026:  Nomination accepted.  I dare him to say "Free Tibet" and walk off the stage.  Though if HE did that, we'd probably be at war tomorrow.  So maybe its a good thing that he won't do that.

1029:  A pean to World War II.  Being victorious in that war is among the greatest thing we have ever done  (though if Germany had never invaded Russia, I wonder....).  I wonder if we could pull that off again.  That kind of sacrifice on all fronts, that kind of mobilization.  I am not sure.  Then again, hopefully we will never have to.

1031:  I don't know if its just being tired or if its the alcohol or just election fatigue, but I am really not into this.  Maybe I've just seen Obama give too many speeches.  Ah, but that is a nice little joke about tax cuts and regulation.  Now he's got my attention.  Let's see if he can keep it.

1032:  There you go.  A reference to our lack of STEM education.  Good good good.  But we are not moving forward yet.

1034:  Goals.  Real achievable plans.  I hope that he is actually going to talk about that tonight.  But maybe its not the place.  The dems seem to have critizied the GOP for not offering many solutions, but so far the dems haven't really offered anything substantial.  Hopefully you reckon that would come out in the debates, but sadly it never does.  The purpose of a convention I guess is to get people fired up - not to go into the nuts and bolts of policy.  Because that shit is boring.

1038:  Was that woman actually texting?  Instead of listening to the president?  I mean, I am kind of doing that, but I am at home....Eh.  I guess I really can't critizise.  Can't spell either.

1039:  I don't think there is a lot of difference between the two candidate's energy change.  Ah, but there we go, Obama is bringing up climate change.  Good on him.  I am more skeptical than I used to be of it, but I still don't think its worth risking.  We'd be better served if we did our best to curve our carbon emissions.

1041:  Obama will also invest heavily in education, whatever that means.  I have to say though that I agree with that.  100,000 new math and science teachers?  Cutting tuition costs?  In half?  That is quite a promise.  Quite a promise.

1042:  A pivot to foreign policy.  Obama's foreign policy is aggressive, problematic (with the drone strikes and such) but all in all I suppose I would have to give him pretty good marks for his foreign policy achievements.  Sort of.  I would disagree that we have reasserted our power though.  If anything, the past few years show that our place in the world maybe needs a little rethinking.  Still, I am surprised that Obama turned out to be as good a foreign policy man as he has.  And I'm glad he is taking Romney to task on Russia.

1046:  Oh!  And a low blow to Romney on his disasterous trip to London!  That was a kick right to the groonies.  Right in the balls.

1047:  I find that Obama is actually giving a good account of thimself.  This is not a great speech, I would say, but he is kind of winning back my confidence.

1049:  And there is a promise to keep all those lovely tax breaks that I have.  I don't think that raising the taxes on the upper classes is going to pay for all that good stuff he wants to keep.  I think taxes should be raised at the top...but I think that the tax base should be extended a little further in the lower classes.

1050:  Eh.  I wonder how he is actually going to save all these entitlement programs.  We are all going to have pay a lot more.  Just canceling the Bush tax cuts is not going to do all that.

1052:  This is Obama at his best.  Citizenship. What is the social contract we are all in?  Do we really want a contract where its every man for himself?  Or do we want to be tied in together, at least a little bit?  Are we willing to exchange some "liberty" for freedom from the fear of being buried in a Pauper's grave?

1053:  Hahaha.  Funny how Obama mentions gays and they find a guy with a....well, a pretty sterotypically gay mustache.  Good job NBC.  Good job.

1055:  Oh please.  That last election was all about you.  I appreciate what you are trying to do, happy you are willingly trying to shed some of your arrogance.  But you annointed yourself a messiah.  (And by you I mean Obama....not an empty chair).

1057:  *sigh*  I don't care what Obama says.  The lobbyists and the heavy donors are never going to go away.  Never.  And it saddens me.

1058:  An admission of some failings.  A reference to faith.  A more appropriate reference to Lincoln.  Though the reaction of some of the people you see in the crowds are just priceless.  So much emotion.  Not as emotional as Manchester City football fans nearly loosing the premier league in the final match of the season, and then miraculously winning it at the death.  But still.

1102:  Preach it brother.  Ride on.  And wrap it up.

1103:  The finale.  No balloons due to the late change of venue.  Point:  Romney.

So it looks like its 2-2.  Romney gets two points and Obama gets two for busting both of Romney's balls, several times over.  Interesting, actually, that Romney was kind of the butt of some of the jokes in the speech.  An excellent, though somewhat disrespectful, way to disarm your opponent.

And its over. It was a "meh" speech, nothing much new here, except maybe for just a touch of humility. Clinton's speech was much better, in my opinion.  But its renewed my confidence in Obama and a vote that was maybe starting to be in doubt has swung back into his favor.

That's it folks.  See you for the debates.

Only 60 days to go.

It can't come fast enough.